When the Google Pixel 7a already has demonstrated that it is a better camera phone and has the same processor as its flagship counterpart, it is somewhat difficult to justify purchasing Samsung’s mid-range Galaxy A54. However, the Cosmic system A54 begins at $450 contrasted with the 7a’s $500, bragging a few of its leader kin’s marquee highlights at a somewhat lower cost than Google’s financial plan choice. A display with a high resolution, a long battery life, and a design that is found to be more comfortable than the Pixel’s angular rectangle and stark camera bar are among those features. The Samsung flagship-level camera, wireless charging, and storage space options are sacrifices.
The Galaxy A54 from Samsung doesn’t look like a budget phone
Keeping a mid-range device from appearing cheap is the key to selling it. That is how Google managed its A-series and what Samsung has concluded to do going ahead. If you bought the Galaxy A53 in black last year, it was boring. However, at least the Galaxy A54 this year looks like its flagship counterpart.
Even in black, the phone looks less “mid-range” than the A53 from last year. In any case, I love the periwinkle blue colorway on our audit unit (it seems purple in Samsung’s true delivers). It has a chic appearance that doesn’t immediately give the impression that this is a device that costs less than $500. In direct light, it looks almost pearlescent. The Galaxy A54 is built to last, with tough glass on either side of the chassis and an IP67 rating for resistance to water and dust. On the outside frame, there is still some plastic, but you can barely tell at first.
The Galaxy A54 (left) versus the Galaxy A53 (right)
The 6.4-inch display on the Galaxy A54 is bold and beautiful. Although it is significantly larger and more saturated than the Pixel 7a’s 6.1-inch display, I prefer the high-resolution Samsung AMOLED’s smooth-scrolling 120Hz refresh rate. The color temperature of the Pixel 7a display tends to be warmer, whereas Samsung displays are bluer, making video and graphics appear more vibrant. The A54 has a maximum brightness of 1,000 nits and is slightly easier to read than the Pixel 7a in direct sunlight.
Samsung’s Exynos vs. Google’s Tensor
Although Samsung’s Galaxy A54 is based on hardware made by Samsung, it is not exactly comparable to Google’s own Tensor G2, which powers the Pixel 7a and its siblings. Samsung’s most recent 8-core processor for the mid-range category is the Exynos 1380. It performs better in tests than the Galaxy A53 from last year, but it still has 6GB of RAM. The A54 is noticeably choppy when switching between apps. Even though the Pixel 7a’s 60Hz default refresh rate has its own issues with smooth scrolling, any sluggishness is more noticeable than on the Pixel 7a because it only happens on occasion.
In battery tests, the Universe A54 outlived its lead brethren and the Google Pixel 7a. The 7a’s 4,385 mAh battery is smaller than its 5,000 mAh counterpart. It went on around 18 hours and 48 minutes in our battery summary test, contrasted with the Pixel 7a’s 16 hours and 11 minutes. It’s encouraging to know that Samsung’s mid-range can last for a long time, especially since it has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
Even though the Galaxy A54 is a phone that costs less than $500, people are disappointed that it lacks wireless charging. I have figured out how to work out an organization of chargers around my home, where I live and work, and it’s basic I can thud down a gadget to charge it. That is possible with the Pixel 7a from Google, but not with the Galaxy A54.
Not the best phone camera for night shots
The three lenses of the Galaxy A54’s camera system include a 50-megapixel primary camera with optical image stabilization (OIS) and an aperture of f/1.8, a 12-megapixel ultrawide, and what appears to be an unnecessary 5-megapixel macro. People prefer telephoto glass for the third camera on the back for a little bit more optical zoom, but never thought to use it during testing period. The 32 megapixel front-facing camera.
Generally, the World A54’s camera framework takes care of business on the off chance that you’re outside and the weather conditions is brilliant. Blues and reds are “punched up” with each photograph, and you can utilize the on-screen camera controls to change the scene when it’s the brilliant hour. If you don’t set the focus point in the right place, you might miss out on a well-balanced picture. The Galaxy A54 has a smooth enough maximum video recording resolution of 4K at 30 frames per second. It stayed aware of my child panning the lines at a beautiful vehicle show, and the mouthpieces were strong at relieving the breeze commotion.
As opposed to the Google Pixel, the Galaxy A54 will not permit astrophotography. It struggled to moderate images and capture sufficient light, even in its dedicated night mode. Additionally, when it did produce an image in the dark, the pixelation is evidence of an algorithmic conflict. Night Sight pictures taken with the Pixel 7a don’t show that as much. In the event that it’s night skies and dim appearances you wind up snapping most, the Universe A54 shouldn’t be your most memorable pick.
Samsung’s version of Android is still good
The Samsung Galaxy A54 has OneUI 5.1 and Android 13. You can use Samsung-exclusive features like Bixby Modes, widget stacks, and a better screenshot manager by purchasing this. For the Galaxy A54, the company has promised software updates for four years and security updates for five years. That is superior to the Pixel A-series, which receives quarterly Pixel-exclusive feature drops in addition to four years of updates (though, like game loot, you never know what you will receive and when).
Samsung’s decision to use unified icons in Android 13 is well appreciated. They give the interface a less cartoonish appearance than the vibrant stock icons. The option to dim the wallpaper when in dark mode makes it more convenient for those with sensitive eyes.
Conclusion
The Galaxy A54 needs a couple of more flagship-like features to legitimize its expense compared with the Pixel 7a. For people who want a mid-ranger that will last them through all five years of Samsung’s security updates, it would be nice if the company added wireless charging or more storage space tiers. Although such concessions may not immediately result in an increase in sales, Samsung may be able to establish itself as a mid-range manufacturer promoting longevity. We would love to see a hardware match because it still has a software advantage over the Pixel at that point.
